First For Bridge

  • News From the Norway Eclipse Bridge Room

    News from the Bridge Room From Allan Sanis On our first morning at sea I gave a seminar on Checkback Stayman. This is a system that enables you to explore the distribution of the two hands and decide whether a major or No Trump contract is the best spot. That evening, on the very first hand, Ros and Peter tried it out for the first time. untitledAfter Peter rebid 1NT (15-17) Ros was able to bid 2C Checkback. Peter answered stop 3H showing a maximum hand for his 1NT plus 5 card Heart suit. Ros bid 3S showing her 5 card Spade suit. Now with 3 Spades Peter was able to bid the Spade game. Without this convention the N/S pair may well have been in 3NT that, after a diamond lead, is a disaster. The full hand was (dealer North) :
  • News from the Menorca Bridge Room

    Menorca 047

    Directors Report

    This hand occurred in the Swiss teams at Salgar. What should East open? untitled If East/West have a weak 2 available that seems to be appropriate. East should raise 2 to 3, pre-emptive rather than a game try because if West wanted more information from East with a view to game he would start with a conventional 2NT (which would ask East to rebid 3if minimum or show a no-trump stopper if maximum. North has 8 tricks. If he bids 3 South may pass, but North has a subtle clue available. The East/West bidding suggests they have nine diamonds, which marks South with a singleton diamond. North would be very unlucky to find South with very short hearts as well, so he has legitimate hopes of dummy covering his diamond losers. Hence 4 looks a good bet. At  one table West passed 2. Paradoxically this makes it harder for North because he can no longer diagnose diamond shortage in his partner’s hand. North has three choices. 1)      North can jump to 3. Note that even if you play weak jump overcalls a jump overcall of a pre-emptive bid is strong. Ron Klinger succinctly says ‘Don’t try to pre-empt against opposition pre-empts.  Should South raise to 4?  Probably, because of the singleton diamond and three card trump support but it is a close decision. 2)     North can take the pressure off South by jumping to 4. He needs very little in the South hand to make game. 3)     North could bid 3, hopefully asking for a diamond stopper and prepared to settle for 4 if South does not bid 3NT. With a solid heart suit and black aces that might seem attractive but bridge players are given to assuming partner will be on the same wavelength. Have you discussed whether 3 asks for a diamond stopper or is a Michaels cue bid showing both majors? If not, best avoid it! If you don’t have a weak 2 available then East can pass or open 1. If East opens 1. West will bid 2♣. What now? North knows that South is likely to be weak and has no reason to believe that South has short diamonds. If 3 would be a weak jump overcall South must choose between 2 and a stronger action, e.g. double followed by bidding hearts. North/South might or might not reach 4. If East passes as dealer West might open a lead directing 1♣ in third seat.  North is too strong for 1 and doubles, intending to bid hearts later. That shows a hand too strong to bid an immediate 1. Anyhow, not surprisingly there were lots of different results. Some Norths played in 3, making easily by means of a diamond ruff (or two) in dummy. Some East/West pairs sacrificed in 5 over 4 and were doubled for -300, cheap against a vulnerable game, provided the game makes. Some Norths played in 4. This is easy after a diamond lead. East switches to a trump but it is too late. Declarer wins the A, ruffs a diamond, crosses with the ♣A, ruffs a second diamond and returns to hand with the ♠A to draw trumps. Suppose East finds an inspired trump lead against 4. Now declarer must realise that playing a diamond leads to making exactly nine tricks. Defenders will win and play a second trump, restricting declarer to one diamond ruff. Declarer must find a line of play that can lead to ten tricks, and he must hope he can use dummy’s 10 9 to help him set up dummy’s spades. He wins A and plays ♠A followed by a spade to the ♠Q. West wins the ♠K but what can he do now? If West forces dummy to ruff a diamond (cutting declarer off from his spades) declarer can ruff two diamonds for ten tricks. Alternatively suppose West continues trumps (or switches to a club).  Declarer wins a trump continuation with dummy’s 9, ruffs a spade with the K, draws the last trump with dummy’s 10 and has two winning spades to cash. Note the different lines of play in 4. It is not uncommon for declarer to have two possible lines of play available, ruffing a loser or two in dummy and setting up dummy’s long suit. It is often the case as here that declarer must choose one or the other: ruffing declarer’s spades good is incompatible with ruffing diamond losers in dummy. Declarer’s chosen line is determined by how many tricks he needs for his contract.
  • News from the Croatia Bridge Room

    Sveti Stefan (2) This was our eighth visit to this beautiful part of the world, it’s a bit like coming home, the staff and management of the hotel go out of their way to welcome us back, embracing those that have been before and ensuring those that are new feel part of one big family. In all the years that Judy and I have been running these holidays we have never received such praise about the quality and number or trips that were offered, our thanks on behalf of Arena go to Aleks our ground agent for his organisational skills, his enthusiasm and the obvious pride he has in his country. Our thanks also to the staff and management of the Meteor Hotel, Andrew Kambites our shy and unassuming director but most importantly all of you who attended for making it a thoroughly enjoyable and rewarding fortnight for everyone. Next year First for Bridge will be offering a two centre holiday that will include a stay in Montenegro, and we are delighted that Aleks will be organising the transfer between Makarska and Montenegro which will include a stop off in the delightful walled City of Dubrovnik on route. Can we remind those of you who have e mail addresses to let Arena know them, it is a method of keeping you up to date not only with the latest news but to also let you know of additional holidays and occasional offers. We look forward to seeing you again in the near future. Martin & Judy Directors Report Dealer South East West vulnerable cards This hand occurred in the Swiss Pairs First let us examine how the bidding should go. After three passes, with a balanced 16 points East has a hand too strong for 1NT and opens 1. Presumably South passes (although if this was not polite company I would admit that at love all at pairs I would overcall 1♠). It is clearcut for West to raise to 2. Although the 1 opening promises only four hearts roughly 70% of the time East will have five. Even if East has only four hearts playing a 4-3 fit at the two level when you have ruffing values in the short hand is very playable. North passes and so should East! Of course West could have nine points, but even then a combined 25 points is likely to make game only marginal. There is no need to strive for thin games at pairs. Now the spotlight turns to South. East/West seem to have found a heart fit but the bidding has subsided at the two level. The points seem to be roughly shared between the two sides and if East/West have a fit, so do North/South. South strains every muscle to enter the auction in the protective position and should bid 2♠. This is not dangerous. North is known to have some points, he also has very few hearts so the likelihood of him having some spade support is high. North will not get too excited if South protects with 2♠. He will remember that South originally passed 1. This suggests to North that either South is very weak or South has only four spades. With only three hearts West should not compete to 3, but he might consider trying 3 which would give his sides a second chance of finding a good fit. North will then compete to 3♠. Well, this did happen at one table and well bid by the players. At a second table East bought the contract in 2, South led the 9, the 10 was played from dummy and North played a catastrophic K, allowing declarer to win the A, draw trumps and run six diamond tricks. Automatically playing 'third hand high' has to be wrong here. If North analyses the lead he will quickly work out that the 9 must be from 9 singleton or 9 4 doubleton. In either case playing the K will only help declarer. At several other tables West wrongly responded 1NT to 1. Some Easts passed, others raised to 2NT (though there is no reason to raise when the partnership has a maximum of 25 combined points and could have as few as 22. Optimistic Wests raised 2NT to 3NT. North led the ♠7 and dummy played ♠4 This is a rare occasion when South cannot tell whether the lead is fourth highest (from ♠Q 9 8 7 x) or from rubbish. If South is confident that the ♠7 is fourth best he can allow the ♠7 to win trick 1, and the defense collects the first seven tricks. South can also defeat the contract by taking the ♠10, switching to the ♣2 and North will switch back to spades, giving North/South the same 7 tricks.This seems more complicated and needs North to have the ♣K but avoids conceding an unnecessary spade trick if North has led from a holding like ♠ 8 7 x. It seems to be a guess. At other tables West correctly raised 1 to 2 but East made an over optimistic rebid of 2NT. 2NT here should show 17-18 points. Of course 1 2♣ 2NT can be bid on 15 points but 2♣ shows a minimum of 9 points. If 1 is raised to 2 West has a maximum of 9 points and there is no percentage value in chasing game with just 15 or 16 points opposite 9. Some Easts now raised to 3NT because of their long diamonds. 3NT is hard to beat: club lead to ♣K, ♠ 7 switch. East and West players who made 3NT were lucky. Even with the diamond finesse working and sufficient entries to the West hand to run the diamond suit it can be beaten quite heavily. If the diamond finesse had been wrong it would have had no chance. Swiss Teams Pat & Mike Gordon, Jill & Richard Lark swissteamsConsolation Pairs Peter & Emilie Kershaw consolationpairsMain Pairs Jan Wynne & Patricia Emmett mainpairs
  • Sad passing of Wendy Brown

    Many of you will know that Wendy Brown recently died. She was a Life Master and died just as she played the best hand of her life!  She has a special place in the history of First for Bridge, as it was she who started the first bridge holidays in Menorca.  Our commiserations go to her family and the many who knew her. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10724713/Bridge-champion-collapsed-and-died-after-rare-winning-hand.html We knew Wendy and her husband Arthur very well. We first met them when we went on our first Menorcan Bridge holiday in 1989. They had been organising this holiday very successfully for many years and we later worked with them before they handed the holiday to David Boston, their director at that time. Following David’s untimely death in 1986 we took over the holiday and gradually expanded the company during the next 18 years. Wendy continued to come to S’Algar for many years. She was a true friend during that time and was always generous in her support and appreciation. We are pleased that she felt the holiday which meant so much to her was in her words “A safe pair of hands” We shall miss her. Martin & Judy Holcombe
  • News from the Turkey Bridge Room

    Bob and Jacky Our first visit to the Hotel Villa Side Residence saw a group of nearly one hundred players enjoying a superb bridge room that would have housed many more. The staff, and especially the local representative Natalie, deserve a special mention. They were extremely helpful and looked after us all very well. It was a five minute walk down to the beach, where there was a pleasant cafe which belonged to the hotel and was part of the all-inclusive package. There were, in addition to a wide range of drinks, light lunches available, and on several occasions an open air barbecue tempted us with with an aroma of cooking meat and chicken. A similar gentle stroll in the other direction brought you to the local town of Kumkoy with many opportunities for a bargain. For those wishing to venture just a little further away there were many trips organised to Side, plus several nearby sites of historical interest and a large market near to a waterfalls. The lounge areas in the hotel were very popular after the evening bridge sessions and nearly all of the players gathered to discuss the hands and enjoy one of the wide selection of (free) drinks. The facilities in general were excellent, with a lovely indoor spa and heated pool, and many guests enjoyed the massage service and Turkish baths. Much appreciated was the weekly laundry service which was free of charge. Finally, our thanks go to Ro and Chris who were always willing to help both before and during the bridge sessions and who were cheerful and friendly throughout. We look forward to working with them again on a future holiday. Director's report With nearly a hundred players at the recent holiday in Turkey there was often a good crowd for the afternoon sessions. To show that not all of the interesting hands occurred in the evenings, the following was hand dealt one afternoon: untitled At one table East-West, despite vigorous opposition bidding in hearts, found the excellent contract of 6♣ played by West. Declarer won the heart lead, discarding 2 from dummy, and, with eleven trumps between the two hands, laid down the ace of trumps. The 1-1 trump split failed to materialise and declarer crossed to dummy and took the diamond finesse. This lost to K and the slam was one down. Rubbing salt into the wound, North then revealed that theK had been singleton. Admittedly declarer was unlucky, both with trumps (a 1-1 split is slightly more likely than a 2-0 split, although the bidding may have suggested otherwise) and then with the diamond king being offside. However, declarer could still have brought the slam home. After cashing the trump ace, he should have played king, ace and queen of spades before ruffing the fourth round. Having eliminated the major suits he then throws North in with his ♣K. North must either lead a diamond (when the position of the king in the suit becomes irrelevant) or give a ruff and discard, when declarer can discard the remaining low diamond from dummy. In either case the slam is made. It would have made no difference if North were able to ruff one of the rounds of spades, as he would have found himself facing the same dilemma of having to lead a diamond or concede a ruff and discard. This was a classic example of an elimination and throw-in endplay. Meanwhile, at one of the evening bridge sessions, on one occasion I received the usual call of "Director, please!" and I approached with the standard "How can I help?" The response was "Director, I have made a rotten bid!" to which I replied "Strictly speaking, that is not against the Laws" and let the bidding continue! Congratulations to the following winners of the principal events: Random teams Paula Ollive, Margaret Sawyer, Jeff & Lydia Stanford Random Teams winners-1             Men's Pairs Michael Whittaker and Jack Clarke Men's Pairs winners - Michael Whittaker & Jack Clarke             Ladies' Pairs Jennifer Kinloch and Brenda Miller Ladies' Pairs winners - Jennifer Kinloch & Brenda Miller           Consolation Pairs Winners Linda Lazarus and Alex Davoud 103_2836        

Items 66 to 70 of 75 total

Page:
  1. 1
  2. ...
  3. 11
  4. 12
  5. 13
  6. 14
  7. 15